The occasion of a recent TCM screening of the R-rated edit
of this forgotten minor masterpiece from the late 60s (one of several by
director Frank Perry yet to make it to DVD - Play It As It Lays, Diary of a Mad Housewife) inspired me to seek out the X-rated version I still remembered
so vividly from my youth. And as memories go, that’s really saying something, for
the youth I speak of is the summer of 1969 when I was 12 years old. In
1969, the newly-instated motion picture rating system (G, M, R, and X) designated
the X rating for films with mature themes from which anyone under the age of 17
was prohibited. Contrary to what “adult” and “X-rated” has come to signify
today (porn), back in 1969 Hollywood harbored the idealistically naïve hope
that such a restrictive rating would both serve to protect local standards of
decency while ensuring filmmakers maximal artistic freedom and minimal
censorship interference.
(Boy, just writing the above sentence made me all wistful and nostalgic for why the late 60s and 70s remains my favorite era in American film. The notion that mainstream Hollywood believed, even briefly, in the notion that there was such an animal as a mature adult audience is near unimaginable in today’s climate of pandering, lowest common denominator comic book franchises.)
Before America’s repressed and essentially hypocritical attitude
about all things sexual reared its head, a slew of intriguing X-rated films
were released (The Damned, Midnight Cowboy, Last Tango in Paris, Last
Summer, A Clockwork Orange, Medium Cool), giving
the false impression that American movies had at last grown up. Alas, it was
not to be, and soon “X” was appropriated by the porn industry and the MPAA (the
industry rating board) embarked on a course of action — doling out harsh
ratings for minor displays of sexuality, yet showing absurd leniency with acts
of extreme violence — that over the years rendered it, if not a laughingstock, then
certainly irrelevant.
(Boy, just writing the above sentence made me all wistful and nostalgic for why the late 60s and 70s remains my favorite era in American film. The notion that mainstream Hollywood believed, even briefly, in the notion that there was such an animal as a mature adult audience is near unimaginable in today’s climate of pandering, lowest common denominator comic book franchises.)
![]() |
| At left: The vague, rather arty newspaper ad for Last Summer containing it original X-rating. Right: The provocative wide-release one-sheet poster with the R-rating. (Newspaper image courtesy of Obscure One-Sheet). |
| Barbara Hershey as Sandy |
| Richard Thomas as Peter |
| Bruce Davidson as Dan |
| Catherine Burns as Rhoda |
I’m not sure whether it was when the film went into wide release
in theaters or when it made it to home video, but eventually some of Last Summer’s X-rated intensity (centered
mostly on the film’s harrowing climax) was edited down to an R. If you weren't around in 1969 and you managed to catch this film at all, the R-rated cut is most
likely the only one you’re familiar with, and it’s this version that Turner
Classic Movies recently aired. Mind you, even this mildly truncated version of Last Summer is still pretty strong stuff,
its brief omissions only marginally softening the effect of the film’s intentionally
blunt sexuality and merciless depiction of a particularly base aspect of human
cruelty. Still, this wasn't the film I remembered and I felt cheated. Happily,
thanks to the trusty internet, I was able to track down an unedited copy of Last Summer (as well as a copy of the long
out-of-print soundtrack album!) and I have to say, getting to see this film in
its entirety for the first time in 43 years has been every bit the emotionally wrenching
experience it was when I first saw it as a pre-teen movie theater scofflaw. (Taking into account changing times, even in its unedited form, Last Summer would only garner an R-rating today. A soft one, at that.)
A trio of teens vacationing with their parents on Fire
Island strike up an intimate friendship when callow, future fratboy, Dan, and sensitive
go-alonger, Peter (Davidson and Thomas) come upon sexually precocious brainiac,
Sandy (Hershey- “Well you asked me, so don’t think I’m boasting, but my IQ is
157.”) tending to a wounded seagull on the beach. Bonding over their shared
isolation, sexual restlessness, and an overweening, heretofore unplumbed disdain
for the feelings of others, the threesome find the dynamics of their tightly-knit
group challenged with the appearance of Rhoda, a bright but shy and awkward girl
who insinuates herself into the fold.
Poignance is derived from the realization that all four teens come from broken or troubled homes and that together they could have faced their shared loneliness, alienation, and struggles for identity in ways enriching for them both as friends and individually. That summer could have been memorable for a lot of good reasons. But, being at its heart an existential parable on authenticity, dread, and the concept of decency as a choice one makes as readily as one can choose cruelty, Last Summer is a season made memorable for our protagonists in ways none of them could have foreseen and none will likely ever forget.
WHAT I LOVE ABOUT THIS FILM:
| Rhoda and Peter's tentative friendship threatens the dynamic of the group |
WHAT I LOVE ABOUT THIS FILM:
Like so many of my favorite films from this era: They Shoot Horses, Don't They?, Midnight Cowboy, Puzzle of a Downfall Child, even Rosemary's Baby; Last Summer is for me a brilliant example of how fascinating the results can be when mainstream movies and art films combine. What all these films have in common is their being accessible narratives that nevertheless convey the darker aspects of American disillusionment in the late 60s. Movies today tend to feed audiences comforting images of themselves and set out to reinforce tissue-thin myths we harbor about everything from sexual politics to racism. Although I don't require it in every film I see, I must say I enjoy it when movies hold up a mirror to American culture that reveals the decay behind the gloss.
Movies in the 60s/70s were comfortable with revealing the darker shades of human nature. In fact, one of my strongest memories of seeing films during this period was getting the distinct impression I was never going to see a movie with a happy ending again. I loved that I was seeing movies that were making me think, making me feel...but at times it seemed as if every movie released during my teens ended in some devastating tragedy. Even the musicals were downers (Sweet Charity)!
PERFORMANCES:
PERFORMANCES:
Playing perhaps on type and using his young cast's relative acting inexperience to their benefit (Last Summer is the film debut of all but Barbara Hershey, who appeared in Doris Day's last film, With Six You Get Eggroll just the year before) Frank Perry gets natural and surprisingly complex performances out everyone, particularly Catherine Burns. Although lacking in the sort of easy, obvious camaraderie Peter Bogdanovich was able to achieve with his cast in The Last Picture Show (most apparent in an uncomfortably forced, "teens bonding" sequence that gives credence to Hershey's claim that despite the intimacy required of their roles, the cast didn't become close during the making of the film), each actor achieves a kind of heroic bravery in allowing themselves to be presented so unpleasantly.
Black Swan!) and proving herself a talented and enduring actress.
THE STUFF OF FANTASY:
Black Swan!) and proving herself a talented and enduring actress.
![]() |
| Poster for the 1975 film, Diamonds, featuring Barbara Hershey with her "Seagull" billing |
Perhaps the parallel symbolism is all too heavy-handed for some, but what I loved about this film in 1969 and what still stands up marvelously in 2013 are the parallels drawn between the film's early sequences involving the attempt to rehabilitate and then train the wounded seagull, and the introduction of the character of Rhoda into the group. The foreshadowing of the film's agonizing denouement is as clear-cut and unalterable as a self-fulfilling prophecy, but what grips me is what lies behind why it happens at all.
To see this film now is to understand what occurs inside any group or individual in power when threatened with the loss of that power. Whether it be the behavior of the GOP in the last election or the reluctance of certain states to grasp the inevitability of same-sex marriage; it all fit paints an ugly portrait of cowardice cloaked in entitled domination. To find all of this within a teenage coming-of-age film is just brilliant, and why this film deserves to be seen.
To see this film now is to understand what occurs inside any group or individual in power when threatened with the loss of that power. Whether it be the behavior of the GOP in the last election or the reluctance of certain states to grasp the inevitability of same-sex marriage; it all fit paints an ugly portrait of cowardice cloaked in entitled domination. To find all of this within a teenage coming-of-age film is just brilliant, and why this film deserves to be seen.
| The casual distractions of an idle summer gradually escalate into experimentation with sex and drugs. |
Notes:
I read Evan Hunter’s novel Last Summer not long after seeing the film and I’d highly recommend
it. Eleanor Perry’s screenplay is a faithful adaptation of the book, which is every
bit as disturbing as the film. The slight novel provides a bit more backstory
to the characters and is told in the form of a flashback memory recounted by an
emotionally shattered Peter to his psychiatrist. In 1973 Hunter wrote a sequel
to Last Summer titled, Come Winter. I’d say that both novels
are unavailable and out of print, but is anything really out of print with eBay around?
Evan Hunter, famous for the novel Blackboard Jungle, is also
well known to Hitchcock fans as the screenwriter of The Birds. He was fired from his duties on Hitchcock’s next film, Marnie, for reasons far too ironic to
recount here. Those who are interested can find the info in the trivia section
of IMDB’s Marnie page.
The late director Frank Perry, largely forgotten today, was
one of the heavy hitters in the Golden Age of the New Hollywood. He is
responsible for two of the best films to come out of the era: Last Summer and Diary of a Mad Housewife. Making it all the more incomprehensible
to me that this is the same Frank Perry who gave us the execrable laugh-fest, Monsignor (1982), and the exquisite
awfulness of Mommie Dearest. Talk about
your loss of innocence.
Copyright © Ken Anderson


Would it be cruel of me to suggest that whatever mistakes Frank Perry made as a director in his film career, that was the part of him that flowed down the family tree to contaminate a certain other Perry with an overwhelming lack of talent?
ReplyDelete(Yes, I was surprised, too).
No apologies, her songs are awful.
I couldn't agree more. Serious ear torture in that department (and yes, I was surprised by that fact gleaned through internet research, too).
DeleteThis was on TCM recently! Luckily I recorded it. LOVE Barbara Hershey.
ReplyDeleteHi Brad
DeleteI'm really grateful TCM brought this film to a lot of people's attention. It is really one of the great lost films of the 60s. And yes, loving Barbara Hershey is pretty easy ( I had a crush on her since way back when I first saw her on "Gidget"). Thanks for commenting!
It is weird how two of Perry's best and most talked-about (in their day) films have vanished - "Last Summer" and "Diary of a Mad Housewife."
ReplyDeleteHe really was a pioneering American indie filmmaker and he doesn't get the credit he deserves. Even "David and Lisa" is off most movie buffs' radar these days and it was a big hit that got Perry a best director Oscar nomination.
With almost everything turning up on DVD these days, I've assumed that the disappearance of the distributor of "Last Summer" (Allied Artists) might have something to do with it vanishing.
You are so right about the role of the X rating in 1969-73. "If..." was another key film of that time that a major distributor (Paramount) put out in an X version without anyone seeming to mind.
Hi Joe
DeleteYes, given how much Frank Perry's work embodies so much of what the New Hollywood was about, it surprises me as well that he and his films are so seldom discussed. I think his films stand up remarkably well, although I seriously don't know what was going on in his later career.
thanks for mentioning "If..." - a well-received X-rated film that i have yet to see. Those days of "X" signifying films with adult themes that didn't need to water -down their presentation to be acceptable to teens was a brief but important time in cinema. I mourn it.
Ken, you and others are so right about the initial X rating, that was eventually tweaked into NC-17 (which is still a category that practically no one wants to fall into!) It's a shame.
ReplyDeleteAs to Miss Hershey and her seagull phase, I recall reading an interview in which she and her Carradine husband(?) had intended to eat the placenta that came along with their new baby, Free, and they attempted it, but weren't able to continue, so they went out into the yard and buried it.... Ah, the 70s... I saw her the other night in The Stunt Man and thought she was quite good in it, especially in a scene that had her manipulated into crying on cue. I still need to see Last Summer, but enjoyed reading about it. Thanks!
Hi Poseidon
DeleteThe trajectory of "X" from being an accepted rating that didn't stigmatize a film, to one associated with the likes of "Myra Breckinridge" and "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls" was swift. Too bad. Kind of like the Pre-Code Hollywood days...it was just interesting what stories could be told when filmmakers felt free.
As for Barbara Hershey, throughout the 70s her oddball life choices played havoc with her career. She was no Lindsay Lohan, but for a time she was mentioned in "Rona Barrett's Hollywood" more for her ostentatiously hippie-esque behavior than for her usually terrific performances. Oddly, her biggest high-profile success (Beaches) is my least favorite performance of hers.
She's a big fave of mine and I hear she is a real sweetheart. Thanks for always stopping by, Poseidon!
Regarding Barbara Hershey's so-called placenta eating incident, in a 1987 Playboy magazine interview, she categorically denies that rumor. Much of her early career was mis-reported which is one reason why she chooses not to discuss that time of her life in interviews. People tend to believe gossip so whatever she says to attempt to clear those stories falls on deaf ears. She has since then reinvented herself time and again proving to the industry that she is a compassionate, versatile and talented, albeit underrated performer whose career remains in full swing to this day. Love you Barbara!
ReplyDeleteThank you very much for stopping by my blog and taking the time to comment (as a Hershey fan myself, I would love to have known what your thoughts were on her performance in “Last Summer” and if you've seen it).
DeleteAnd as per an earlier commenter's claim to having read about Hershey and the whole placenta-eating thing (I did too: People Magazine, May 1979) I have to say, as a film researcher, it is common to come across conflicting tales about a celebrity. If history has taught us anything, it's that celebrities want us to disbelieve the negative press and wish us to believe the positive press. My sympathies lie with the public, which is fed what the press or the PR people want us to believe on either side….and rarely is it the truth either way!
If history has taught us anything, it's that today's unsubstantiated gossip is tomorrow's dyed-in-the-wool fact when the celebrity is good and ready to reveal it (or gets caught).
Stars like Rock Hudson (gay), Loretta Young (illegitimate child), and Diana Ross (affair with Berry Gordy) have all gone on record denying "gossip” that eventually revealed itself to be fact. Inconvenient fact, but fact. No one really knows because all-too frequently the celebrities themselves prove to be the least reliable resources (because in spite of it being “their” personal experience, they are the ones who have the most vested interest in lying about it).
As producer Robert Evans said (and I try NEVER to quote Robert Evans) "There are three sides to every story: your side, my side, and the truth, and no one is lying."
So whether we read it in “People” or “Playboy,” the position we take on an article’s veracity is the one that best serves us what we want to believe. Thus, what’s fair is to believe what we want about a celebrity and let others believe what they want.
I believe Ms. Hershey did comment that the placenta was used to fertilize a fruit tree that her son could later eat from when he grew older. The telephone game may have come into play so the story could have morphed into her actually eating the placenta herself. Regardless, when it comes down to it, it's none of our business really. This gossipy rhetoric detracts from her career accomplishments which are greatly admirable. We all have cringe-worthy decisions we look back on with regret. Celebrities have to content with the public microscope which comes with fame. I wish her nothing but success in all her new ventures.
DeleteFolks, I'm always greatly gratified when people take the time to stop by my blog, but really? No comments relating to the film at hand? I'm afraid this will have to be the last comment I'll publish on the dreaded "placenta" topic. If there's more to say you can write my personal email.
DeleteI love give and take exchanges of differing opinions about movies and their stars (both pro and con) wherein both sides respect the other's perspective or position. I'm less fond of celebrity defense campaigns. They tend to stifle discussion and reduce everything to "fan" vs. "haters"
I would compare the late 60s/early 70s Hollywood to the pre-Code early 30s era, in which a combination of technologies and social upheaval combined to free movies (for a time) of certain stale, accepted conventions and stereotypes (the 30s had sound and the beginning of the Depression; the 60s had various cultural revolutions and younger filmmakers raised on watching TV and developing a more acute visual sense). I like your point about movies with unhappy endings (also seen frequently in pre-Code films; if you get a chance, check out the 1931 'Safe in Hell'); it may sound weird, but I prefer them when it would be the more honest, truthful solution. The sense of unreality given off by so much Hollywood product is frustrating, especially compared with European art cinema.
ReplyDeleteAnd you make another great point, which you've discussed in other blog posts, about why some films are inaccessible and not released on DVD. I know sometimes it's an issue of rights; but often it's just baffling why major movies haven't made it to the video market, whereas forgettable TV series are rushed to the store shelves. I'm dismayed by what seems an increasing lack of interest in our cultural history. Even with the vastness of information on the Internet, people seem so incurious today about what happened more than a week ago. It's as if our shared cultural past is slipping away.
Hi GOM
DeleteAs always, another thoughtful post that had me scurrying to Google to search ""Safe in Hell", a film I've never heard of that sounds amazing (and bleak!). Thanks for the tip on that one.
The parallel you make with films from my favorite era and those of Pre-Code Hollywood is a good one, and I agree with you in nothing that they were inspired by changes, both cultural and technological. Formula is fine for some film, but I do enjoy it when films break from the established and take us out of our complacency with fresh narratives and startling ways of seeing the world through film.
And indeed, as for the whole DVD availability issue, it sometimes borders on the criminal the vast amount of worthwhile films that have yet to be released in this format. I suspect that there are too many marketing people in charge of DVD releases and not enough true lovers of film. Good to hear from you again, GOM!
Does anyone remember Last Summer ending after the rape scene with a shot later with Rhoda on the beach playing in the sand with some children in her old swimsuit?
ReplyDeleteThe ending you speak of occurs in the book, but not the film. In the book, there are a few more days left of summer and Sandy, Peter, and Dan encounter Rhoda one day and they exchange cursory hellos. There is a lack of remorse on the part of the three that is chilling.
DeleteIn an interview about the film some time later, director Frank Perry has stated that, unlike the book, he wanted to end the story with Rhoda left "psychologically crushed" in the forest like the seagull. And, to have the obviously stunned Peter shown physically at a distance from Dan and Sandy, hinting that, as the more sensitive of the three, he had fallen the lowest and was perhaps as damaged by what happened that summer as Rhoda.
Thanks for an interesting question!